Why you can trust the results
Methodology, score stability, protection from prompt injection and data security — each layer of trust is its own page. Start wherever your question is.
EvalLense scores by structured rules— judge roles, rubrics and weights — not by an AI's general impression.
The evaluation stays controllable and explainable, and the final decision always rests with a person.
Five pages, one click away
Each layer of trust is its own page. Open the one that answers your question.
How decks are evaluated
Criteria-based evaluation, judge roles, the scoring model and the rubric system — the science behind the score.
Open Consistency & ReliabilityStable, repeatable scores
Multi-judge evaluation, variance analysis, repeatability and confidence checks.
Open Prompt Injection SafetyInstructions can't hijack scoring
Hidden instructions inside a deck are treated as content, never as system commands.
Open Security & PrivacyPrivate deck handling
Access-controlled workspace, secure report delivery and a human-controlled final decision.
Open Use CasesWhere EvalLense applies
The decisions and programs the evaluation supports, from VC funds to universities.
OpenTrust, one layer at a time
Confidence in a score builds across four layers. Each lights up as you scroll — follow it to its page.
- 01How we evaluateCriteria-based scoring with defined judge roles and a rubric — not a generic AI impression.Methodology
- 02How stable it isSeveral judges, variance analysis and repeatability checks keep scores consistent.Consistency & Reliability
- 03How the scoring is protectedHidden instructions in a deck cannot override the evaluation rules.Prompt Injection Safety
- 04How data is handledPrivate workspace, controlled access and secure delivery — the human keeps the final call.Security & Privacy
Built for high-stakes evaluation
The same trust layer supports decisions across very different programs — scroll through, then see the full picture.
VC funds
Screen inbound decks at batch scale.
Accelerators
Rank cohorts consistently before selection.
Angel investors
A structured read on early-stage decks.
Corporate innovation
Evaluate internal and partner pitches.
Startup competitions
Score entries against shared criteria.
Grant programs
Comparable evaluation across applicants.
Hackathons
Fast, repeatable judging of project pitches.
Universities
Teach and assess pitch quality at scale.
See how the evaluation holds up on your own decks
Book a demo and walk through the methodology, the reliability checks and the safeguards end to end.