Pay for the event, not every seat
Each plan gives you a fixed number of evaluated submissions for one event window. No seats, tokens, or usage surprises.
Free Trial
$0
3 submissionslifetime · no credit card
Test EvalLense with 3 real submissions.
Best for: a first look before you commit.
- 3 submissions (lifetime)
- All 6 AI judges (preview)
- Evidence-linked reports
- Human-in-the-loop scoring
- Recommended
Standard
$1,500
150 submissions120 days · 5 projects
For a full pitch competition with up to 150 submissions.
Best for: a single full event.
- Full evaluation workflow included
- Leaderboard + CSV / PDF export
- Custom criteria weights
- Top-up +25 / $300 ($12 each)
Pro
$3,900
500 submissions180 days · unlimited projects
Evaluate large cohorts and recurring programs.
Best for: large or recurring programs.
- Everything in Standard
- Limited custom AI judges
- BYO LLM (add-on)
- Top-up +50 / $500 ($10 each)
Enterprise
from $15,000
1,000+ submissionscontract term
Corporate, universities, and custom judging workflows.
Best for: custom, high-volume programs.
- Everything in Pro
- White-label branding
- SLA + security review
- Dedicated support
For smaller events: Starter is $199 for 15 submissions. Pilot is $500 for 40. See the full comparison below.
Compare plans
Compare submissions, validity, projects, exports, support, and admin controls.
| Plan | Free | Starter | Pilot | Standardrecommended | Pro | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $0 | $199 | $500 | $1,500 | $3,900 | from $15,000 |
| Submissions included | 3 | 15 | 40 | 150 | 500 | custom |
| Validity | lifetime trial | 90 days | 90 days | 120 days | 180 days | contract term |
| Projects | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | unlimited | custom |
| Top-up package | — | +10 / $150 | +10 / $150 | +25 / $300 | +50 / $500 | custom |
| Effective price per submission | — | $15 | $15 | $12 | $10 | custom |
| 6 AI judges (P1–P6) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Evidence-linked rationale | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Human-in-the-loop scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Review Board + leaderboard | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prompt-injection safety & privacy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-upload page | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| CSV export | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| PDF export | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Remove watermark | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom AI judges | — | — | — | add-on | limited | ✓ |
| BYO LLM | — | — | — | — | add-on | ✓ |
| White-label branding | — | — | — | — | — | ✓ |
| SLA + security review | — | — | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Admin seats | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | custom |
| Human judges | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 25 | custom |
| Support | — | — | Async setup | Setup call + priority | Setup call + priority | Dedicated |
Event workflow and AI evaluation in one place
Event platforms manage submissions and judges. AI deck tools review one deck at a time. EvalLense evaluates the full cohort — six independent judges, evidence-linked rationale, a leaderboard, and a human-owned final decision.
| Capability | Event-workflow platforms | AI deck-analysts | EvalLense |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI deck evaluation as core | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Six independent judges (P1–P6) | ✗ | partial | ✓ |
| Transparent rationale (no black box) | ✗ | partial | ✓ |
| Evidence-linked scoring | ✗ | partial | ✓ |
| Whole-event evaluation (not single deck) | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Leaderboard / ranking | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Human-in-the-loop final decision | manual | ✗ | ✓ |
| Questions for the live jury | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
They manage the competition. EvalLense helps compare who is strongest and why.
They review decks. We run structured evaluation across an entire competition.
From submission to shortlist
Each submission is reviewed by six AI judges, linked to evidence, and placed in a leaderboard for human review.
- Core toolkit included
The full evaluation toolkit is included
Every plan includes the same evaluation core: judges, evidence, reports, review, and safety. Plans only change limits, volume, and admin control.
- Six-judge review
Six independent judges
Each deck is reviewed across P1–P6, with a score, confidence signal, and evidence behind the call.
- Evidence reports
Reports you can defend
Each participant gets strengths, weaknesses, evidence, and sharper questions for the live review.
- Human decision
The human makes the final call
Use the Review Board to compare teams, adjust context, and rank by your Final Score.
- Trust layer
Safety is part of the workflow
Prompt-injection checks, privacy controls, and no-black-box rationale are built in from the start.
- Plan controls
Controls scale by plan
Weights, templates, branding, SSO, and API access scale with the plan you choose.
Pricing questions
- What counts as a submission?
- One submitted pitch deck or application that receives one successfully generated AI evaluation report.
- Is this a subscription?
- No. You pay per event — a package of submissions with a validity window, not a monthly per-seat fee.
- What if I run out of submissions?
- Add more anytime with top-up packages (from $150 for 10, cheaper on higher plans), or move up a plan.
- How long do submissions last?
- Starter and Pilot, 90 days; Standard, 120 days; Pro, 180 days; Enterprise, the contract term.
- What if a deck can't be processed?
- It doesn’t count as an evaluated submission. Disagreeing with the AI output isn’t a failed evaluation either.
- What if a team resubmits after the report?
- A new report counts as a new evaluation.
- Is there a paid pilot?
- Yes — Pilot, $500 for 40 submissions. Talk to sales.
- Is my data safe?
- Yes. Safety and privacy controls are included on every plan. Security & Privacy.
- Who makes the final decision?
- A person. AI prepares the analysis; you decide. Methodology.
Ready to evaluate your next cohort?
Start with 3 free submissions, or book a demo using your own decks.